Talk:Terunosuke Miyamoto/@comment-93.210.2.42-20150807010712/@comment-26871105-20161118132601

Terunosuke did what he did mostly to complete a job, just that he was having a little bit of fun while doing it. He's clearly not guilt-free, but it doesn't mean we should sentence him with a punishment equivalent to several life-imprisonments either.

Moral and justice (assuming we're talking about their ideal forms) do not conern whether or not you're sensitive about something, it only concerns the relative and objective severity of a crime. Terunosuke is for all intends and purposes, a first-offender who while has harmed but hasn't actually killed anybody yet, and should be treated as such. There is no "he touched my sensitive area should he should be punished more" in justice, because it's barbaric and nonsensical.

Do you sentence someone to a punishment equivalent to several life imprisonments for first offence of kidnapping just because the person being kidnapped is your relative? Obviously, it doesn't work like that.

Terunosuke is clearly not on the same level as Angelo, one is just a kid who got too ahead with whatever he's doing while the other is a serial killer with a proven and disgusting record under his belt; it makes no sense to put them on equal terms. Sure, Josuke's method is understandable considering the incident with his grandpa, but it's clearly not justified. Now don't get me wrong, I'm not asking gary-stu's or mary-sue's nor am I saying that Terunosuke is innocent, but it's quite clear that the way Josuke ended this case is pretty darn savage.