Thread:MetallicKaiser/@comment-26160153-20160909165645/@comment-1739368-20160911075106

When I gave my opinion on the Great Days trivia, the point I was trying to make is that something being "interesting" doesn't really serve as a suitable criteria since it can easily be interpreted differently by different people. We need something more solid, something that has clearly defined boundaries cause otherwise this type of controversy will only continue on forever.

And I agree that the chase analysis is almost completely speculation. If that's the case, maybe we will also need to fortify what should be considered speculation? Obviously physical proof comes to mind, but maybe something else as well? If we don't, again, this type of arguing is going to continue forever.