Thread:Nabukun/@comment-28666442-20160907012413/@comment-1739368-20161002101050

Actually, I made it very VERY clear that I wanted this to be a group discussion, but for whatever reason you decided to bounce on the previous. I don't consider it my fault if you feel the need to either bail or "end a discussion" by blocking a page, closing a thread, throwing a fit. I'm not enabling Nabu either; not once did I say he was correct, I only stated what I've observed from your actions. The fact of the matter is you decide to protect pages and prevent all other users from editing them without proper explanation. The protect description says "High traffic," but not only were all previous edits done on it appropriate fixes, but they were done rather spread out. Can you seriously justify that?

As for the trivia opinions, your beliefs or MINE don't necessarily hold more weight than others. You can say junk trivia doesn't hurt anyone, but claiming that this is correct is wrong. It's purely subjective. That's why I start discussions in the first place, to form ideas through logic and gather data from different people to find a suitable answer. However, it seems quite clear from the previous thread that this is a topic that nobody wishes to budge on. The arguments are never going to stop because nobody wants to say they're wrong. That's why I'm going to take action and set up the guidelines by taking other people's opinions into account. And maybe I didn't make it quite clear, but I said that discussion for these guidelines can continue on in the forums even after they're created. I'm not unanimously making rules, I'm just laying down a template that can be further discussed; taking initiative so to speak. The team input still very much exists.