Thread:Nabukun/@comment-28666442-20160907012413/@comment-26160153-20161002055145

I also don't appreciate the fact you're insinuating that I'm only speaking up because I'm butthurt. I've spoken up about Nabukun's mass-deleting before; most were justified and others weren't.

Frankly, I've tried to speak up about reworking this "junk trivia" system before because people obviously take the words too seriously while others don't know what the fuck they're supposed to put down as Trivia because the guidelines are more confusing than King Crimson.

But whatever, if you want to enable him Kai, go ahead. I've always been a firm believer that "junk trivia" doesn't hurt anyone. As an admin, I believe that my word is just as much law as yours is.

Honestly, "junk trivia" like "this was the first ____" is harmless. The ACTUAL changes we should make are trivia should only be deleted if they're speculation. Trivia being deleted because it's interesting AND uninteresting, the first blahblahblah, etc. shouldn't be a factor at all.

Don't mean to sound like an asshole, but I don't see why you get to unanimously make the rules when in actuality, we should both go over these guidelines of yours to settle on what goes in or not. That an effective team makes. If you don't want to try working as a team on this, don't bother replying.