Thread:Nabukun/@comment-31493785-20170430192431/@comment-31493785-20170501024845

General English grammar rules say so, but I didn't base my edits off that. If you look at this page, which also contains a flashback, it is written in present tense. I assumed that using another page on the wiki from the same part and containing a flashback would be valid enough precedent. So, should we either change the Ch. 49 page and all othe flashbacks that include the present tense, or undo my edit to keep in line with precedent. It's your call.