Board Thread:Manga Discussion/@comment-39718735-20200516000645/@comment-46358516-20200902015007

Why? I already explained to the guy that both terms "That" and "The" can talk about just 1 object, but he keeps saying that Polnareff is "generalizing" in his lines. I'll tell you, there are situations in which jojofag's are more boring than goku / naruto fans, and this is one of them, I wouldn't mind if it was called boring, but at least I don't use an argument as "generalizing", being that the person may also be talking about just 1 object. Man there are countless arguments that I didn’t use here, like for example in that scene giorno saying: "I will not destroy this arrow";

On this page, Giorno explains to Polnareff that he will not destroy this arrow, so this means that if he did not have this "duty of the survivors", he would destroy the arrow. Now, why was he going to destroy the arrow? think :)

OBS: I admit that, there was a mistake in saying that "the arrow of the pucci ended up in Egypt", I really went to check and, at least in the flashback, there is no dialogue saying that it was ended up in Egypt (so maybe it can be mentioned on other chapters) and that does not mean that it is not the same, and ended up in Egypt, it may be, it may not be.