Board Thread:Articles Discussion/@comment-24634448-20160622104448/@comment-27659575-20161003010751

It looks good, but also it's like you've avoided the main problem of the whole "junk trivia" argument:  How interesting should an information be to be allowed into the trivia section?

As I said, pointing the obvious, especially when it doesn't add anything to the understanding of the articles, should be banned from trivias. I recommend adding that

"Information that can be directly deduced from the observation of the concerned subject and all related previous material doesn't qualify as valid trivia".

Besides, in relation with the hard limit I'm recommending, I think superficial comparisons between Stands doesn't qualify as true trivia, because again, just by looking at the Stands, one can deduce this information easily.