Board Thread:Manga Discussion/@comment-39718735-20200516000645/@comment-39718735-20200826232627

Calebeto wrote: And now you've decided to get all smug instead of keeping discussing like a serious person, quite a pity.

For starters, let's analyze the sentence: you say "that" and "the" are referring to a singular object, that specific arrow (and that I don't know both words can be synonyms, but I'll let that aside). Then you say Polnareff while saying that in the segment " "The arrow draws out stands from those who have potential. But if it happens to pierce a Stand" he referred to that only arrow, as if the other arrows would be mere arrows and this one would be "the arrow" compared to them... yet it's still ambiguous cause all arrows draw stands from those who have potential and Polnareff never ever saw what would happen if any other arrow would pierce another stand, we see an instance of that, but Polnareff never did so. How would he ever know if another mere arrow wouldn't do the same when he only has that one?

Btw have you got any evidence of that arrow being the exact same one? in this very wiki no one mentions anything about such thing, otherwise that's a conclusion you assumed on your own.