Thread:MetallicKaiser/@comment-26160153-20160909165645/@comment-1739368-20160910034653

The real issue here derives from the fact that what people find "interesting" is totally subjective, hence why these type of arguments happen over and over again. Personally, I think the first woman singer is a solid trivia, but at the same time I think the "first third opening" is just pointless information. Thing is though, that doesn't mean I'm correct, that's just my opinion.

If we want to fix this issue, we're going to have to create some criteria that isn't left to interpretation. At the very least, there's two I think we can agree on. The first and most reasonable one is that any information, such as stand namesakes or appearance details should be in their proper places, not in the trivia section. Second is obviously no speculation. I'd say about 80% of what Nabu removed or transferred violated both these rules, so good on him for that.

With that out of the way, we now have to deal with this "First to, Second to, etc" problem. First woman singer seems reasonable, but who's to say "Joseph is the first JoJo to have brown anime hair" isn't also interesting? Where exactly should we draw the line when it comes to what should be considered good trivia? Doesn't drawing this line to begin with seem rather conceited?

While we're at I'd like people to post some samples of trivia that Nabu deleted that people consider "interesting" and we'll try analyzing them here. And just to clarify, I'm not declaring anything, I'm merely stating my thoughts on the matter and trying to get a discussion going. Ultimately, I want this pointless controversy to end and not just linger like what happened with the last thread.