Thread:MetallicKaiser/@comment-26160153-20160909165645/@comment-1739368-20160910034653

The real issue here derives from the fact that what people find "interesting" is totally subjective, hence why these type of arguments happen over and over again. Personally, I think the first woman singer is a solid trivia, but at the same time I think the "first third opening" is just pointless information. Thing is though, that doesn't mean I'm correct, that's just my opinion.

If we want to fix this issue, we're going to have to create some criteria that isn't left to interpretation. The first and most reasonable one is that any information, such as stand namesakes or appearance details should be in their proper places, not in the trivia section. Second is obviously no speculation. I'd say about 80% of what Nabu removed or transferred violated both these rules, so good on him for that.

Now we have to deal with this "First to, Second to, etc" ordeal. First woman singer seems reasonable, but who's to say "Joseph is the first JoJo to have brown anime hair" isn't also interesting? Where exactly should we draw the line when it comes to what should be considered good trivia? Doesn't drawing this line to begin with seem rather conceited?

While we're at it let's get some samples of some trivia that Nabu removed that people consider "interesting" and analyze them.