He told me that at the very start of the debate, he kept telling you that he didn't want to and he didn't care for it at all

He seems to be telling the truth considering it bothered you that much that you wouldn't leave him alone about it

I wonder how you would have felt if Lazy just came into your dms with a random guy who you know nothing about who also happens to be a friend of his and went "he's the judge of our debate". Seems like a true way to debate, am I right?

💀

Obviously, he wasn’t interested, because he doesn’t care about winning a discussion honestly. I asked Lazy to have a discussion with a judge because, as I said before, that’s the correct way to debate. On the wiki, the winner is the one who bores the other first, literally repeating the same arguments ad nauseam since there’s no other way to declare a winner except that way. It doesn’t matter if he wasn’t interested, tough luck, he agreed to start the discussion, used the same arguments he always used in my DMs and on the wiki, and he lost, fair and square. I even started first to give him an advantage, but he lost.

Now he's trying to backtrack with all these excuses, but I told him exactly who the judge would be, so yeah, he lost.

Im not gonna continue this any further, you seem to stay true to your opinion regardless of how many holes and issues it has with it (seems like you and lazy have smt in common, you both repeat argument further pushing the suspicion on that debate that has little to no value lol) but like i said, whatever helps your ego

i will pray for your mental status and hope you focus on things that really matter 🙏

Pure hypocrisy.

Concession accepted

insulted a random guy on a wiki: +1000000 ego points!!!!

@Holydiver42069 close this, the situation is degenerating.

^the only correct thing you said in this post

👏👏👏